Value based argumentation frameworks software

In value based argumentation frameworks vaf, an argument a1 successfully attacks defeats a2 only if the value promoted by a2 is not ranked higher than the value promoted by a1according to some strict partial ordering on values. Vaf ar, andattacks are as for a standard argumentation framework, v is a nonempty set of values, val is a function which maps from elements of ar to elements of v, and valprefs is a. This paper introduces the notion of valuebased argumentation frameworks, an extension of the standard argumentation frameworks proposed by dung, which are able toshow how rational decision is possible in cases where arguments derive their force from the social values their acceptance would promote. Preventing manipulation in aggregating audiences in value. Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation. Existing semantics are solely based on the attacks and do not take into account other important criteria like the intrinsic strengths of arguments the contribution of this paper is three fold. Value based argumentation frameworks computer science intranet. Payers and providers alike recognize the shift to value based care, but most are struggling to make the significant adjustments needed to achieve success.

An implementation of dungs abstract argumentation frameworks. In proceedings of the 10th international workshop on nonmonotonic reasoning nmr02, whistler, 443454. An argumentbased collaborative negotiation approach to. How much logical structure is helpful in contentbased. In computer programming, a software framework is an abstraction in which software providing generic functionality can be selectively changed by additional userwritten code, thus providing applicationspecific software. Abstract argumentation frameworks from theoretical. In advances in knowledge representation, logic programming, and abstract argumentation. In particular the notion of an argumentation framework af, introduced by dung, allows us to explore a system of conflicting arguments, in which arguments are. Value based management i n the early 1990s, the business press, securities analysts,and management consultants widely touted value based management vbm as a new tool to help investors assess companies and help executives evaluate business performance and shareholder value. Asp encodings to compute the extensions of modgils extended argumentation frameworks allowing for attacks on attacks. Value based argumentation in hierarchical argumentation frameworks conference paper in frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications 144. Valuebased argumentation framework built from prioritized. Successfully transitioning customers from volume to value. The result is a completely new software tool that we are very excited about.

The example is a short text found on the internet that explains to the reader how to attach a flagpole bracket to the vinyl siding on the side of your house. Within a vaf, which arguments are accepted depends on the rank. We had extended the value based argumentation framework vaf in order. In particular we show that in a vaf certain arguments can be shown to be acceptable independent of the relative strengths of the values involved. Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments abstract over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in argumentation. Extension based semantics of argumentation frameworks for agent interactions w 5 w 6 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 8 w 14 w 12 w 7 w 10 w w 9 w 11 w 5 w 6 w 1 w 2 w. Eiter, preferred answer sets for extended logic programs, artif. Lisowski, grzegorz and doutre, sylvie and grandi, umberto preventing manipulation in aggregating audiences in value based argumentation frameworks. Following perelman, we argue that persuasion relies on a recognition that the strength of an argument depends on the value it advances, and that whether the. A value based argumentation framework vaf is a 5tuple. Rankingbased semantics for argumentation frameworks. Argumentation is a reasoning model based on the construction and the evaluation of interacting arguments.

Thefactualpart of the global theory contains arguments that are based on some expert knowledge modeling the regular. You dont need an immense marketing or design budget to put what makes your business the best frontandcenter in your messaging just a little focus and a moment or two to consider your site from the. Software quality framework introduction linkedin slideshare. A valuebased argumentation framework is a 5tuple vaf. Value based argumentation frameworks bipolar afs bafs. Argumentbased collaborative negotiation approach there are two foundations in our approach. This paper proposes a new family of semantics which rankorders arguments from the most acceptable to the weakest ones. This study presents an argumentation based design rationale application for supporting communication and reflection in design. Vaf ar, attacks, v, val, p where ar is a finite set of arguments, attacks is an irreflexive binary relation on ar, v is a nonempty set of values, val is a function which maps from elements of ar to elements of v and p is a set of possible. It has popular language bindings for python, perl, ruby and many other languages, and unlike other crossplatform toolkits, wxwidgets gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platforms native api rather than emulating the gui.

Wellfounded semantics for extended logic programs with dynamic prefer. Value based argumentation frameworks as neuralsymbolic learning systems 3 of values, is a function mapping elements in to elements in, and is a set of possible audiences, where we may have as many audiences as there are orderings on. In his model, whether argument a ultimately defeats argu. Theyre specifically geared toward facilitating the development of software applications and include components, such as libraries of code, support programs, compilers, tool sets, and specific apis that facilitate the flow of data. A, v is a nonempty set of values, val is a function which maps elements of a to elements of v and p is the set all specific audiences. A value based argumentation framework is a 5tuple vaf. Solving weighted argumentation frameworks with soft. To model this we extend the standard notion of argumentation frameworks afs to value based argumentation frameworks vafs. Preferred extensions as stable models theory and practice. Extensionbased semantics of argumentation frameworks for. This method is called reliability based argumentation framework rafs, extended from argumentation framework, seeking for multivalued dialectical validities of arguments reliable to some extent. Little is known about the extent to which logical structuring helps to increase a users task performance. Valuebased argumentation for democratic decision support.

By now, argunet belongs to the senior citizens of the software realm. D of the variables, returns a value of the semiring. It identifies the source of properties used for evaluating the status of arguments in argumentation frameworks. Ranking based semantics for argumentation frameworks leila amgoud and jonathan bennaim irit cnrs abstract. Argumentation has gained an increasing interest from researchers in artificial intelligence. The work which is closest related to ours is by nieveset al. The modular reliability based argumentation framework mraf based on rafs is able to integrate the raf semantics in every module. Rich preferencebased argumentation frameworks archive ouverte. After defining vafs we explore their properties, and show how they can provide a rational basis for the acceptance or rejection of arguments, even where this would appear to be a matter of choice in a standard af. Acceptable sets of arguments, called extensions, are computed using a semantics. Hopefully these value proposition examples have given you some ideas of how you can improve or clarify your business value proposition. Frameworkltc solutions allow independent pharmacies to save time and money by eliminating manual steps and enhancing customer service capabilities with fully integrated pharmacy, content and delivery management software designed by softwriters, the software innovators for ltc pharmacies. In many cases of disagreement it is impossible to demonstrate that either party is wrong.

Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks t. Aspartix answer set programming argumentation reasoning tool. Probabilistic reasoning with abstract argumentation frameworks. As a first example for generalising basic afs, we deal with valuebased afs vafs benchcapon 2003 which themselves generalise the preferencebased afs amgoud and cayrol 2002. Pdf valuebased argumentation frameworks as neuralsymbolic. Implementing argumentation frameworks using answer. Following perelman, we argue that persuasion relies on a recognition that the strength. Complexity in valuebased argument systems springerlink.

Answerset programming encodings for argumentation frameworks. Here we adopt a preference based approach, in the value based variant originally due to benchcapon 6. Value based argumentation in hierarchical argumentation. In a debate, rankings on arguments or argument relations are given as components based on features of argument schemes.

A software framework is a reusable environment thats part of a larger software platform. Our analysis clarifies the role and contribution of distinct approaches in the construction of rational debate. Abstract argumentation scheme frameworks proceedings of the. On the acceptance of loops in argumentation frameworks. An argument is seen as a reason for believing in a statement, doing an action, pursuing a goal, etc. In the literature on abstract argumentation, frameworks for modelling this phenomenon have been proposed by several authors, including amgoud and cayrol 1 and benchcapon 6. Argumentation frameworks based on contextual preferences. For a stateof the art introduction see baroni and giacomin 2009. Value based argumentation frameworks semantic scholar. Proccedings of the fourteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence uai 1998, pp.

The main problem with modular frameworks is that the test script have test data embedded in them. To model this we extend the standard notion of argumentation frameworks afs to valuebased argumentation frameworks vafs. Value based argumentation enhances a classical abstract argumentation graph in which arguments are modelled as nodes connected by directed arrows called attacks with labels on arguments, called values, and an ordering on values, called audience, to provide a more finegrained justification of the attack relation. The value based argumentation frameworks come from the idea that during an exchange of arguments, some can be stronger than others with respect to a certain value they advance, and so the success of an attack between arguments depends of the difference of these values.

So when the test data needs to be updated we need to change the code of the script. Social welfare semantics for valuebased argumentation. Social welfare semantics for valuebased argumentation framework. Rich preferencebased argumentation frameworks sciencedirect. Progressive defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks. Chapter 1 assumption based argumentation phan minh dung, robert a. On the acceptability of arguments in preference based argumentation. The role of argument in such cases is to persuade rather than refute. This paper introduces the notion of valuebased argumentation frameworks, an extension of the standard argumentation frameworks.

Preferred extensions as stable models volume 8 issue 4 juan carlos nieves, ulises cortes, mauricio osorio. Value based argumentation frameworks trevor benchcapon1 and paul dunne1 abstract. An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments. Bipolar argumentation frameworks extend dung afs by a support relation extended afs eafs. This paper introduces the notion of value based argumentation frameworks, an extension of the standard argumentation frameworks proposed by dung, which are able toshow how rational decision is possible in cases where arguments derive their force from the social values their acceptance would promote. Value based payment vbp is a concept by which purchasers of health care government, employers, and consumers and payers public and private hold the health care delivery system at large. While it has grown quiet around this blog, behind the scenes, we were busy experimenting with a different technological approach to argument mapping. Lamb, value based argumentation frameworks as neuralsymbolic learning systems, journal of logic and computation, volume 15, issue 6, december 2005. Current argumentation support software often employs graphical representations of logical relationships. Argumentation frameworks anargumentation framework af is a pair a. Stack overflow for teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. Assumption based argumentation phan minh dung, robert a. An argumentation framework is seen as a directed graph whose nodes are arguments and arcs are attacks between the arguments. R where a is a set of arguments r a a is a relation representing attacks defeats abstract argumentation frameworks november 2009 4 20.

Essays dedicated to gerhard brewka on the occasion of his 60th birthday, pages 249264, 2015. It provides a standard way to build and deploy applications and is a universal, reusable software environment that provides particular functionality as part of a larger. Citeseerx document details isaac councill, lee giles, pradeep teregowda. In the field of ontology mapping, using argumentation to combine different mapping approaches is an innovative research area. Control argumentation frameworks on a high level, a caf is an argumentation framework where arguments are divided in three parts, factual, uncertain and control. Valuebased argumentation enhances a classical abstract argumentation graph in which arguments are modelled as nodes connected by directed arrows called attacks with labels on arguments, called values, and an ordering on values, called audience, to provide a more finegrained justification of the attack relation. Recently, it has also been shown that value based argumentation frameworks can be integrated with neural networks, offering a unified model for learning and rea soning about arguments, including. Concordia university, 2016 automated negotiation technologies are being increasingly used in business applications, especially in the ecommerce domain. A framework for argumentationbased agent negotiation in. Aggregation in valuebased argumentation frameworks oatao. Persuasion in practical argument using value based. Valuebased argumentation frameworks as neuralsymbolic learning systems 3 of values, is a function mapping elements in to elements in, and is a set of possible audiences, where we may have as many audiences as there are orderings on. A short introduction to abstract argumentation frameworks.

Analytic frameworks for assessing dialogic argumentation. This becomes a big problem when the test script is large. Hierarchical argumentation frameworks organise dung argumentation. Benchcapon department of computer science the university of liverpool liverpool, uk abstract. Explanations and arguments based on practical reasoning. Reasoning about what to do in a given situation termed practical reasoning in the philosophical literature has important differences from. Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks.

Extension based semantics of argumentation frameworks for agent interactions w 5 w 6 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 8 w 14 w 12 w 7 w 10 w w 9 w 11 w 5 w 6 w 1 w 2 w 3 w 4 w 8 w 14 w 12 w 7 w 10 w w 9 w 11 cristian gratie. In this paper a representative example is chosen that is meant be fairly simple for illustrating the point that in a very common kind of instance, argument and explanation are mixed in together in a text of discourse. An argumentation system consists of a set of interacting arguments and a semantics for evaluating them. The study employs a design science research methodology and contributes to research by investigating the design and evaluation of a software artefact, namely the rationale browser. Although reasoning about what is the case has been the historic focus of logic, reasoning about what should be done is an equally important capacity for an intelligent agent. An argumentation framework based on contextual preferences cpaf is a tuple where a is a set of arguments, r is a binary relation representing a defeat relationship between arguments, c c1, cn is a set of contexts, is a complete preordering on c c, prefi is a partial or complete preordering on a a. Logically intuitive properties of argument acceptance criteria have been paid great attention in the argumentation frameworks, however, which do not take into. In value based argumentation frameworks vaf, an argument a1 successfully at. For this purpose, data driven testing frameworks have been introduced.

An abstract framework for argumentation with structured. A soft constraint 7,5 may be seen as a constraint where each instantiation of its variables has an associated preference. At change healthcare, we help customers successfully navigate the transition from feeforservice to value based reimbursement. An alternative way to describe argumentation semantics is based on the concept of an argument labeling 17, 19. One is the argument structure that is based on toulmins generic argument structure 9. Value based argumentation frameworks vaf definition 7. Rankingbased semantics for argumentation frameworks leila amgoud and jonathan bennaim irit cnrs abstract. In many cases of disagreement, particularly in situations involving practical reasoning, it is impossible to demonstrate conclusively that either party is wrong. With more than one agent facing such an argumentation problem, agents may. Formally, a valuebased argumentation framework is a tuple,, with and similar to the standard framework a set of arguments and a binary relation on this set, is a non empty set of values, is a mapping that associates each element from to an element from, and is a preference relation transitive, irreflexive and asymmetric on. A framework for argumentationbased agent negotiation in uncertain settings omar ibrahim marey, ph. Learn more moq setting up a method based on argument values multiple arguments. Valuebased argumentation frameworks as neuralsymbolic.

844 796 1094 29 982 1259 291 751 22 878 329 335 121 1500 183 512 893 10 740 410 540 509 1500 783 399 70 208 704 987 413 563 846 592 388 948 484